I just want to say Dewey is one of the worst cops in the history of all cop characters!..lol! I have never seen a cop so powerless before like he is. Idk what Gale sees in him..lol. He might be even worse than Doofie..hahaha

Dartagnan;24236 wrote:
Thank you. I kind of like the idea too. It isn't a far stretch I just don't think it would fit with her character. Hahaha, Doofie was hilarious. No, Dewey definitely needs to get the axe this movie. he pretty mich is on the verge of dieing in every movie. If one of them should live it should be Gale.

Yeah she should definately live...after all who else would write the sequel to the book??

stacee_danielle;24239 wrote:
Yeah she should definately live...after all who else would write the sequel to the book??

Exactly. Who would report it to the masses. She is the character who must go on in the series. Dewey can be heroic and save her, but getting himself killed in the process.

any more news on this?

Yes, the are currently reviewing scripts now: Scream 4 News and Updates

I hope they go through with this!!

While SCREAM 4 is still very much in the early stages of development, we have a few exclusive facts to kick start the hype. Fact #1: Kevin Williamson (writer of two of the SCREAM films (character credit on third)) is going to start writing a draft, although it may or may not become the shooting script (which is typical). Fact #2: Wes Craven may or may not direct, but there is a very good possibility that he will return. Fact #3: They are making financial offers to David Arquette, Courtney Cox Arquette and Neve Campbell to play cameos. Fact #4: This will be a younger version of the SCREAM movies.

[via Bloody-Disgusting]

Fact #4: This will be a younger version of the SCREAM movies.

Wonder what that means?

OtherPplsDrama;45211 wrote:
Wonder what that means?

I think it means a younger overall cast. So 20 year olds vs. Neve Campbell aged (35) cast members.

Bacchus;45213 wrote:
I think it means a younger overall cast. So 20 year olds vs. Neve Campbell aged (35) cast members.

OK gotcha. :)

Hmm, I was thinking more on this... I don't think they mean prequel as it would be hard to then incorporate the cameos mentioned.

Bacchus;45213 wrote:
I think it means a younger overall cast. So 20 year olds vs. Neve Campbell aged (35) cast members.

UGHHH my favorite series is going to be ruined. ****it.

RockSteadyVybes;45334 wrote:
UGHHH my favorite series is going to be ruined. Dammit.

They should not be doing another one. You should never do more than 3! Heck, I think that was even a rule in a Scream movie...

Bacchus;45339 wrote:
They should not be doing another one. You should never do more than 3! Heck, I think that was even a rule in a Scream movie...

Hee! It was. And I agree, it's been too long since the trilogy wrapped up that any attempt to continue will just taint the series.

OtherPplsDrama;45342 wrote:
Hee! It was. And I agree, it's been too long since the trilogy wrapped up that any attempt to continue will just taint the series.

As scared as I am for it to suck....if Craven and Williamson are behind it, I'll def go check it out. I trust them.

RockSteadyVybes;45367 wrote:
As scared as I am for it to suck....if Craven and Williamson are behind it, I'll def go check it out. I trust them.

Agreed I am a big horror freak, and the first one is a classic in eversy sense, but the series as a whole is good, but Craven is genius as well as Williamson, so I have faith, but cameos do not sit well with me. Either make them the stars, which they should, or leave them out completely. By the way, its nice to know I am not the only one who knows BD!

Im pissed! LOL. Cameos? This is awful. I personally love all 3 movies and its my favorite horror series ever. Im mad.

They never leave it alone...if something made or makes money they will try to build off that. Having Craven and Williamson on there would make you feel safer but it still seems like there is a chance it might not bring justice to the series. I'll still watch it though.

Hey I was just wondering if anyone has heard anything else on this??

They probably could've quit after the second one actually.

Binary Solo;55058 wrote:
They probably could've quit after the second one actually.

I personally thought part 3 was very good in the sense that it gave the whole series some closure. Granted it borrowed a huge concept from part 1 (maternal abandonment and a thirst for revenge as a result) but that is what made part 3's plot so believable for me. Add to that the oustanding performance by Scott Foley that made me feel bad for the villain (I didn't feel bad for Billy or any of the others from the first two). I personally thought two was not all that but it worked as part of the Triology and was entertaining in its own right. That said, this movie should NOT happen. Especially if the original actors only have cameos - if that. Stop mucking up my horror movies already!! *End rant*

Not yet - I think its still in preproduction stages.

RockSteadyVybes;55209 wrote:
Not yet - I think its still in preproduction stages.

Thank you!

RockSteadyVybes;55209 wrote:
Not yet - I think its still in preproduction stages.

Where it should remain forever as to not taint what is a classic horror spoof. Not only are they planning on a Scream 4, but I get the impression there are planning a 5 and 6 as well. What I have read seems to infer they want to "reboot" the series. I can't think of one movie that I enjoyed with a 4 attached to it, let alone a 5 or 6.

Bacchus;55218 wrote:
Where it should remain forever as to not taint what is a classic horror spoof. Not only are they planning on a Scream 4, but I get the impression there are planning a 5 and 6 as well. What I have read seems to infer they want to "reboot" the series. I can't think of one movie that I enjoyed with a 4 attached to it, let alone a 5 or 6.

*ahem* Halloween 4 F13 part 4 Lethal Weapon 4 Die Hard 4 Nightmare on Elem Street 4 to name a few

Zachary;55219 wrote:
*ahem* Halloween 4 F13 part 4 Lethal Weapon 4 Die Hard 4 Nightmare on Elem Street 4 to name a few

That is exactly what I am saying! All of those are perfect examples of milking series that logically concluded in a trilogy, to lesser effect.

Bacchus;55222 wrote:
That is exactly what I am saying! All of those are perfect examples of milking series that logically concluded in a trilogy, to lesser effect.

Halloween needed a fourth installment to save itself from the absolutely terrible third film. The third didn't even have Michael Myers in it!!!

Buck05;55224 wrote:
Halloween needed a fourth installment to save itself from the absolutely terrible third film. The third didn't even have Michael Myers in it!!!

That was their plan. Each Halloween was going to be different from the third on out but the fans went postal.

Bacchus;55218 wrote:
Where it should remain forever as to not taint what is a classic horror spoof. Not only are they planning on a Scream 4, but I get the impression there are planning a 5 and 6 as well. What I have read seems to infer they want to "reboot" the series. I can't think of one movie that I enjoyed with a 4 attached to it, let alone a 5 or 6.

Honestly, 3 couldve and shouldve been WORLDS better than what it was. In my opinion, the series is kinda already tainted because of it. 1 and 2 are fantastic. And yeah...they want to reboot the series (stupid Weinsteins!). Kill kill, destroy destroy. I don't get how on earth they can reboot it and make it relevant to the series.

BD Horror News - 'Scream 4'? Keep on Dreaming... 'Scream'? Now We're Talking! Well guys just wanted to share with you all... its official.There rebooting this series as well.Remaking the original movie.Its just out and I totally hate Hollywood right now remaking all the classics messing them up.Scream is not even 20 years old there from the late 90's last movie came out seven years ago.Oh well thanks New Line Cinema for screwing up yet another classic.