Lindsay Lohan and Hayden Panettiere

Noooooo! What is she doing! Hayden is so pretty and seems so put together... Why is she being seen with that mess!

Don't panic Lindsay apparently has some sort of face disease and Hayden as a Hero has to save her, perfectly logical explanation for them being together. HAHA "Proactive" usually has celebs that never really needed it anyway....

GoldenWarrior;27565 wrote:
Don't panic Lindsay apparently has some sort of face disease and Hayden as a Hero has to save her, perfectly logical explanation for them being together. HAHA "Proactive" usually has celebs that never really needed it anyway....

I see what you are saying! Claire Hayden is going to give Lindsay some of her blood and it will heal her oozing festival of zits complexion. It makes complete sense now!

I just wish she would give those damn leggings up. THEY DON'T LOOK GOOD!

Here is a picture from the same party with Lindsay holding her "coke straw" looking like a tramp:

bratty;27572 wrote:
I just wish she would give those damn leggings up. THEY DON'T LOOK GOOD!

But at least they prevent us from getting unsolicited crotch shots!

killer_tofu;27575 wrote:
But at least they prevent us from getting unsolicited crotch shots!

BTW: Is "that" a seam or a crease? lol

Bacchus;27576 wrote:
BTW: Is "that" a seam or a crease? lol

Haha... I know... that's what I was wondering...

Bacchus;27568 wrote:
I see what you are saying! Claire Hayden is going to give Lindsay some of her blood and it will heal her oozing festival of zits complexion. It makes complete sense now!

YES! That is exactly what I mean! I wonder if they actually hang out or was it was just a one time party thing. And what is that on her left wrist in the third pic? lol

Yeah she's looking really raggedy! Either she doesn't give a sh**, or she isn't realizing it.

It took all of 10 seconds using Photoshop CS3 to determine that the images had been doctored. The blemishes on her have are "drop in" rectangles that do not happen with mathematical precision in a digital camera, especially not when similar features on Hayden's face are proportionally random.

I doubt this is photoshopped.

At first, I thought it was totally real. But it could honestly be fake. I have never seen Lindsay Lohan look that trashy. It looks terrible. Blonde was never a suitable color for her. And Hayden has never looked like that before either. I am guessing photoshop as well V1.

Dartagnan;27593 wrote:
At first, I thought it was totally real. But it could honestly be fake. I have never seen Lindsay Lohan look that trashy. It looks terrible. Blonde was never a suitable color for her. And Hayden has never looked like that before either. I am guessing photoshop as well V1.

As usual, you are wrong Dart! ;) It was taken from a series of about 40 photographs and they all show the same face puss. No they are not all photoshopped. Here are a couple more (they are huge so they will take time to load.) You need to double click the image to see the zoomed in version.

On can never know without looking at the original image or at any embedded metadata. There is none for this image, so I have to work from what I've been given. Here is a portion of the one originally posted here. Note the area in the black box on which I'll focus my attention. Here is the same area expanded... you can see any definition because the quality of the original image is suspect given the 72 dpi resolution on your screen. Finally, here is slice of the image just above now seen at the pixel level. Note the boxed, rectangular shapes that appear where the eye sees what appear to be blemishes on the original. I see three distinct one on my screen. These appear to me to be "drop ins," something an accomplished graphic artist would do to intentionally create such a negative effect for a specific commercial product (like horror film). Absent the original image or the accompanying metadata, I remain suspect as to the origin of Lindsay's "bad skin." JMVHO

It is pixelated because I took a 2 MB image and shrunk it to 50K. It is called compression and it is what we do to make pages load this year. ;) Just look at the accompanying pictures above, all with the identical blemishes in better resolution and you will see she has consistently horrible skin...

Bacchus;27597 wrote:
It is pixelated because I took a 2 MB image and shrunk it to 50K. It is called compression and it is what we do to make pages load this year. ;) Just look at the accompanying pictures above, all with the identical blemishes in better resolution and you will see she has consistently horrible skin...

I worked with the "facts" presented: the initial two images. Perhaps I would have a different conclusion with a minimum of three images of at least 1MB to review. The skin discoloration on the first two images does not match. That could be for a variety of reasons including that they were sort a different times (obvious), with different lighting (somewhat obvious but in need of the metadata) or were imported from a camera raw format with red tone enhanced, which brings out everything under one's makeup and the epidermis. Image source?

well, either way... the poor girl is beat.

We could go in circles with this all day. The reality is, those are zits on Lyndsay's face. You can also head over to WENN and pull up any picture of her taken in the last 6 months and you will find similar bacteria having its way with her. :D

Bacchus;27602 wrote:
We could go in circles with this all day. The reality is, those are zits on Lyndsay's face. You can also head over to WENN and pull up any picture of her taken in the last 6 months and you will find similar bacteria having its way with her. :D

I'm guessing the check from the Proactive people arrived? ;) I did some checking elsewhere and found three images representing Lindsay over the past 90 days -- all from wire service suppliers. Interesting, least to me. I do have one more image for people who are reading this discussion... because if it is of interesting to anyone but the two of us having it, you may be a ;)

Just to bring up a point... in those first two pictures right there- they are obviously events to me, which would make me think she prob has a ton of makeup on. And with the right makeup artist, the worst skin can look the best. I don't care if she has bad skin or not, but I don't think that it should be some surprise that she's not taking great care of her skin, considering the war currently going on between her and her dad.

dramaqueen1717;27619 wrote:
Just to bring up a point... in those first two pictures right there- they are obviously events to me, which would make me think she prob has a ton of makeup on. And with the right makeup artist, the worst skin can look the best. I don't care if she has bad skin or not, but I don't think that it should be some surprise that she's not taking great care of her skin, considering the war currently going on between her and her dad.

I think that's the least of her worries... Or at least, I imagine that's not the main thing contributing to the current state of her skin...

killer_tofu;27621 wrote:
I think that's the least of her worries... Or at least, I imagine that's not the main thing contributing to the current state of her skin...

True, but I decided not to touch on that... I just hope Hayden stays true to who she is, and doesn't get roped into the drama that is Lindsey...

Bacchus;27595 wrote:
As usual, you are wrong Dart! ;) It was taken from a series of about 40 photographs and they all show the same face puss. No they are not all photoshopped. Here are a couple more (they are huge so they will take time to load.) You need to double click the image to see the zoomed in version.

Thanks for the encouragement Bacchus. :) SO are you saying you think some of them are photoshopped then? I think she does looked messed up, but I have never seen her look exactly like that. She could possibly have all those zits, and if she odes, I require she gets to a dermetologist quick status, because those zits are connect-a-dot material.

V1man;27603 wrote:
I did some checking elsewhere and found three images representing Lindsay over the past 90 days -- all from wire service suppliers. Interesting, least to me.

Interesting in that they are all blurry, pixelated, small and make it impossible to see exactly how much foundation she had caked on...(which I am guessing is a lot!)

dartagnan;27627 wrote:
so are you saying you think some of them are photoshopped then?

Zero percent of the photos I posted on this thread are photoshopped. Do you think that her mug shot is photoshopped? THE GIRL HAS ACNE! I am not even sure why were are having this conversation as the point of the thread was to bring light to the fact that Lindsay and Hayden were hanging out. The fact that Lindsay has bad skin is a well known fact and why she inked a deal with Proactiv (which really doesn't work.) There are literally a few thousand photos that are a mouse click away that show her with acne. This is like arguing that there is no snow in the alps and all the pictures that you see of the alps (with snow) are photoshopped.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlPvfXNR1j4

If I were to download the lager images from the source, each one would cost me at least $300. No thanks. I'll fold.

V1man;27631 wrote:
No thanks. I'll fold.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tSo4IICBTY

Truer words never spoken (or sung).

You know I do feel like a totally loser now for reading and following all of this. Yes, Lindsay has acne! That's a fact, photoshop or no photoshop. It's there.

V1man;27635 wrote:
Truer words never spoken (or sung).

Hahaha. :D