After seeing Camilla's progress in that elimination challenge, I'm even more sorry for her that Eric quit. Did they really just have a few left? However, the words, still a little too much. Although it is a pretty heated situation to be in. And I find it quite ironic that Chet's the one that commented on Preston's eyeliner and glitter shortages.

kvm1977;323877 wrote:
Who?

If you haven't realized by now, keep watching.

analogdog;323908 wrote:
If you haven't realized by now, keep watching.

There's very few that would even have a chance--Chet is one of the smarter people there. Name some if you disagree otherwise I'm just going to assume you're trying to start an argument over nothing

kvm1977;323910 wrote:
There's very few that would even have a chance--Chet is one of the smarter people there. Name some if you disagree otherwise I'm just going to assume you're trying to start an argument over nothing

Even 'very few' means some, am I correct? Did you see the edited footage where others spelled more difficult words? I doubt it. Am I privy to it? Let's just say I am. You, seeing a few snippets for a few minutes once a week can determine who is smarter than who? Pfft. NOT.

analogdog;323915 wrote:
Even 'very few' means some, am I correct? Did you see the edited footage where others spelled more difficult words? I doubt it. Am I privy to it? Let's just say I am. You, seeing a few snippets for a few minutes once a week can determine who is smarter than who? Pfft. NOT.

I never said "none". You can claim whatever you want. Doesn't mean I'm believing it. Name some people and the "more difficult" words they spelled. Back up your claim.

kvm1977;323916 wrote:
I never said "none". You can claim whatever you want. Doesn't mean I'm believing it. Name some people and the "more difficult" words they spelled. Back up your claim.

She doesn't need to do anything. She has said what she has said. It is up to you whether to believe her or not.

molds13;323929 wrote:
She doesn't need to do anything. She has said what she has said. It is up to you whether to believe her or not.

Thank you Molds! Go here

CJ, Derek, and Jonna seem intelligent. The St. Thomas kids do. Trishelle, Sarah, Chet. Dustin seems like a bright boy. Melinda/Lacey.

molds13;323929 wrote:
She doesn't need to do anything. She has said what she has said. It is up to you whether to believe her or not.

And if people don't want to support their claims that's fine but I sure can ask them to support their claims. Seriously, if someone wants to claim to be an insider in a discussion they should be willing to support it. Why bring it up if you won't support it?

So not being able to spell makes someone dumb? What if someone is smart but just a bad speller?

kvm1977;323972 wrote:
And if people don't want to support their claims that's fine but I sure can ask them to support their claims. Seriously, if someone wants to claim to be an insider in a discussion they should be willing to support it. Why bring it up if you won't support it?

If they want to offer up that information without being asked ("xxx told me that..."), that's fine. Asking someone to reveal who their insider is (and, in the same sense, their information) is not. It also potentially gives away spoilers - which are not allowed in the episode threads. Clearly analogdog likes her anonymity and is not willing to give that up. Time to move on.

molds13;323980 wrote:
If they want to offer up that information without being asked ("xxx told me that..."), that's fine. Asking someone to reveal who their insider is (and, in the same sense, their information) is not. It also potentially gives away spoilers - which are not allowed in the episode threads. Clearly analogdog likes her anonymity and is not willing to give that up. Time to move on.

We can move on but if they use "information that is unavailable" in a discussion they should expect to be asked to clarify. Notice the rude response I received for simply asking who? Answering "who?" in no way would have given away her identity or source. It wouldn't even have implied she was an "insider". Would have just been an opinion at that point. And with that I'm done.

Debut Album;323975 wrote:
So not being able to spell makes someone dumb? What if someone is smart but just a bad speller?

That's a good point :P I would say half of the cast is fairly intelligent.

Seminole;324028 wrote:
That's a good point :P I would say half of the cast is fairly intelligent.

I suppose it depends on what subject they're discussing.

Can't win a World Series with such a bad bullpen. The Tigers don't have that guy to come in and get out of an inning when they need it.

TheFeedMachi;324066 wrote:
Can't win a World Series with such a bad bullpen. The Tigers don't have that guy to come in and get out of an inning when they need it.

Ya the tigers sucked this episode.

TheFeedMachi;324066 wrote:
Can't win a World Series with such a bad bullpen. The Tigers don't have that guy to come in and get out of an inning when they need it.

Or bats...

molds13;324183 wrote:
Or bats...

I just realized I had posted in the wrong thread. The bats aren't the issue. The Giants just have really really good pitching and good pitching always beats good hitting.

TheFeedMachi;324191 wrote:
I just realized I had posted in the wrong thread. The bats aren't the issue. The Giants just have really really good pitching and good pitching always beats good hitting.

The guy who pitched last night was, by far, their weakest pitcher in the rotation. And we could only manage two hits. When we shell out a **** ton of money for bats, they should be hitting, no matter who they're up against. Go here